Selected Product: | Modern Landscape Architecture: A Critical Review Paperback Publisher: The MIT Press Release Date: 1994-07-25 ISBN-10: 0262700514 ISBN-13: 9780262700511 List Price: $42.00 Average Customer Rating: | | The Landscape Urbanism Reader ISBN-10: 1568984391 ISBN-13: 9781568984391 List Price:$29.95 Recovering Landscape: Essays in Contemporary Landscape Theory ISBN-10: 1568981791 ISBN-13: 9781568981796 List Price:$24.95 Theory in Landscape Architecture: A Reader (Penn Studies in Landscape Architecture) ISBN-10: 0812218213 ISBN-13: 9780812218213 List Price:$29.95 Invisible Gardens: The Search for Modernism in the American Landscape ISBN-10: 0262731169 ISBN-13: 9780262731164 List Price:$44.00 Icons of Twentieth Century Landscape Design ISBN-10: 0711225338 ISBN-13: 9780711225336 List Price:$45.00 |
To use our price comparison to get the cheapest price, please click on the "Find the Cheapest Price" button located above for Modern Landscape Architecture: A Critical Review by 0 (ISBN-10: 0262700514, ISBN-13: 9780262700511). At this time we have not yet written a review for Modern Landscape Architecture: A Critical Review by 0 (ISBN-10: 0262700514, ISBN-13: 9780262700511). Please continue to keep checking back to this page as we are constantly adding reviews. Summaries and Customer Reviews are supplied by Amazon.com These twenty-two essays provide a rich forum for assessing the tenets, accomplishments, and limits of modernism in landscape architecture, and for formulating ideas about possible directions for the future of the discipline. Modern Landscape Architecture brings together seminal articles from the 1930s and 1940s by Garrett Eckbo, Dan Kiley, James Rose, Fletcher Steele, and Christopher Tunnard, while contemporary writers and designers such as Pierce Lewis, Catherine Howett, John Dixon Hunt, Peter Walker, and Martha Schwartz examine the historical and cultural framework within which modern landscape designers have worked. Understanding modern garden design | Customer Rating: | | This book is a rare find since it is a collection of articles which help explain the origins of the Modern Garden . Through it you can trace the formation of midcentury design . Through it you can learn what Modernist garden designers were reacting to in traditional garden design and architecture , and discover how influential Landscape Architects like Thomas Church and James C.Rose used this new "freedom". The book is witty and the viewpoints are diverse. It should be required reading if you are training as a garden designer or a Landscape Architect in part because it a corrective to the usual theoretical approaches . | Lagging behind architecture, but finally catching up. | Customer Rating: | | The editor, Marc Treib, said in the introduction that ideas in the field of landscape architecture is 15 years behind architecture(and architure is behind art for another 15 years). But for the history of modernism, landscape architecture seemed to be behind architecture for several decades. Finally, landscape architecture has its own history.This book can be read along with "Invisible Gardens" (MIT Press, 1994)written by art critics Melaine Simo and landscape architect Peter Walker.That would makes a general picture of what modernism in landscape architecture is like. But what happened after modernism? For those who really interested in the subject of modernism/postmodernism in landscape architecture, i suggest them to read essays in Landscape Journal, e.g "Cubist space, Volumetric space, and Landscape Architecture" by Patrick M. Condon(spring, 1988),who called for a transition of design paradigms of landscape architecture in the late 20th century ; or "Form, Meaning, and Expression in Landscape Architecture" by Laurie Olin, who had criticized some important classical, modern and contemporary landscape architectural works. That would makes a more comprehensive and in-depth exploration in the changing ideas of landscape architecture. It's kind of pity that "a critical review" is just an anthology of pappers in one single symposium(and some historical documents) that some important concepts like Condon's were elimated. So a more coherent and critical history of modern(even 20th century) landscape architecture is still expectative. |
|