Selected Product: | Facts on the Ground: Archaeological Practice and Territorial Self-Fashioning in Israeli Society Paperback Edition: 1 Author: Nadia Abu El-Haj Publisher: University Of Chicago Press Release Date: 2002-02-01 ISBN-10: 0226001954 ISBN-13: 9780226001951 List Price: $24.00 Average Customer Rating: | | The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy ISBN-10: 0374531501 ISBN-13: 9780374531508 List Price:$15.00 Orientalism ISBN-10: 039474067X ISBN-13: 9780394740676 List Price:$15.95 The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine ISBN-10: 1851685553 ISBN-13: 9781851685554 List Price:$14.95 Recovered Roots: Collective Memory and the Making of Israeli National Tradition ISBN-10: 0226981584 ISBN-13: 9780226981581 List Price:$22.00 The Invention of Ancient Israel: The Silencing of Palestinian History ISBN-10: 0415107598 ISBN-13: 9780415107594 List Price:$40.95 |
To use our price comparison to get the cheapest price, please click on the "Find the Cheapest Price" button located above for Facts on the Ground: Archaeological Practice and Territorial Self-Fashioning in Israeli Society by Nadia Abu El-Haj (ISBN-10: 0226001954, ISBN-13: 9780226001951). At this time we have not yet written a review for Facts on the Ground: Archaeological Practice and Territorial Self-Fashioning in Israeli Society by Nadia Abu El-Haj (ISBN-10: 0226001954, ISBN-13: 9780226001951). Please continue to keep checking back to this page as we are constantly adding reviews. Summaries and Customer Reviews are supplied by Amazon.com
Archaeology in Israel is truly a national obsession, a practice through which national identity—and national rights—have long been asserted. But how and why did archaeology emerge as such a pervasive force there? How can the practices of archaeology help answer those questions? In this stirring book, Nadia Abu El-Haj addresses these questions and specifies for the first time the relationship between national ideology, colonial settlement, and the production of historical knowledge. She analyzes particular instances of history, artifacts, and landscapes in the making to show how archaeology helped not only to legitimize cultural and political visions but, far more powerfully, to reshape them. Moreover, she places Israeli archaeology in the context of the broader discipline to determine what unites the field across its disparate local traditions and locations.
Boldly uncovering an Israel in which science and politics are mutually constituted, this book shows the ongoing role that archaeology plays in defining the past, present, and future of Palestine and Israel. Thought provoking | Customer Rating: | | Scholarly, unbiased, thoughtful argument touching on a highly explosive, emotionally charged issue, nationhood. Insightful and courageous thinking. Explores how groups come to define themselves and suggests how distinctions and divisions among "tribes" of humans are created and promoted. Very interesting! | Fine, I'll buy it. If you apply it to your own idols. | Customer Rating: | Yech, I just read the 'The New Yorker' article on how hard-done-by this scholar is because of the pro-Israel lobby. Weep into your six figure salary.
I didn't dislike this book because I have some cherished memory of working on a kibbutz when I was sixteen. I'm not rolling my eyes because I'm a bible/tanakh believing Person of Faith, for whom this book was an insult to my treasury of psalmic images. Not at all. What annoys me is how philosophers are now pretending to be social scientists -- blowing hard at the biases of the other, while generously milking their own.
This book's debt to Foucault and Said is obvious, and the template is well worn. Nothing original here in terms of formulation: the author begins with an indictment and then proves it with every word. Conclusions are now contained in the preface. (I blame the culture of Grant/Fellowship hunters for this one).
Nation/people/collectivity/history = political construct. Predictable strategy. 'Nations' are nothing more than a composite sketch of ideological madmen who will falsify a body of authentic knowledge to suit their purposes. Tradition? Illusion. Heritage? Romanticised trinkets. Archaeology? Figments. The connections between 'past' and 'presents' are forgeries, in which collective memory -- trapped in the here and now -- gropes in the dark of ersatz evidence.
Now of course it's easy (and academically expedient) to target 'Israel' with such a critique. Finkelstein has shown us that those snapshots of grim horror from Auschwitz are ripe and ready for mere sentimentality as well.
I'm just wondering . . . is anyone going to try this stunt with the Lakota or Cherokee? Has anyone come along yet and said -- sorry, my 'native american' friend, but your claims to a continuity with the land are an imaginary construct . . . a discursive formulation of ethnic selfhood. It sounds really good, but it's completely conjured up out of pottery shards and nameless bones. Try it. See what kind of response you get.
And "Palestine" isn't just as much a product of violent ideologies, enforced senses of community through religious pressure and social groupthink . . . not to mention an unhealthy fabrication of identity grafted onto history? I buy your argument. Sure -- the ruins of Masada, and their historical associations, have been used to create modern Israeli myths of resistant nationalism. I agree.
And, uh, Paslestinians can lay claim to al-Aqsa mosque because of a vague reference in the Qur'an? As if this isn't some loosey-goosey archaeology of knowledge -- that some guy (er, Noble and Most Sublime Prophet) called Muhammad floated through the night sky and ended up in Jerusalem one night? As if even their preferred name for Jerusalem, 'al-Quds', is not also a product of histiographic nostalgia? How about this: the only reason Jerusalem even registers in the Arab imagination of the past was because of its trophy value in conquest; its trade route marketability; and now because that golden dome generates kamikaze-like enthusiasm. There. A nice bit of architecture to be sure, but also an "archaeological practice" that "self-fashions" a society.
Come on. Play the theory, but don't play it blind.
But, with Israel, it's a good way to get tenure. Especially at Columbia. That's what I see here. At least Ilan Pappe, who I think does a much better job at the issues of how culture overwrites topography, has an ethical mandate. This whole book to me just stank of a carreerist agenda.
What bothers me the most about this work is how flimsy social theory, culled from French philosophy of the 1960s, passes off as 'research'. It's not. Archaeology should be done by archaeologists, not literary critics. Ilan Pappe's work is so damning and effective because it ruthlessly pursues the historical record on Israel's self-conception. This book is just tired post-structuralist theory, foisted along a well-worn path. As the author reminds us in the "New Yorker" -- she had to turn grants and funding down, so flush with money to write this stuff.
So don't worry. As I've heard, all the archaeological remains under the Temple Mount are being destroyed as we speak. But weep not -- just nameless bits of stone. | An Amazing, Top-Rate Scholarly Work | Customer Rating: | | This is an amazing book that should be taught in every relevant course! As an archaeologist, I found it impeccably researched, well-written and indispensable. A must-read for those who are committed to rigorous scholarship as opposed to political agendas. What is most remarkable about this eye-opening book is the disciplined and highly sophisticated methodology in utilizing original sources in order to interrogate the construction of historical identity. The author masterfully examines the process of legitimization and transformation of land attachment into an ideological or religious attachment. This book will be required reading for my graduate and also advanced undergraduate students. | What next? | Customer Rating: | What's next?. "Aristotle the arab muslim" or " The writings of Prophet Plato (Peace Be Upon Him)". You can mark the stages of the American academy's decline by the resurrection of Noam Chomsky, the ascension of Edward Said, the introduction of Norman Finkelstein and the tenure of Nadia Abu El-Hadj. | This should never have been published | Customer Rating: | This is a book which should never have been published. This work is an effort to completely erase the historical connection of the Jewish people to the land of Israel. It ignores the established historical record to spin a fantasy tale which in effect fits in with the whole Islamist effort to eliminate the Jewish connection with the Holy Land. It also ignores the work of generations of archaeological work done in the field. It is not a work of scholarship but rather a work which flies in the face of all respected scholarship in the field. A disgrace. |
|