| | ||
| | | |
| |||
| |
|
| |
![]() | ![]() |
|
| | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() Accounting & Finance Architecture Arts & Photography Business & Investing Business Management Computer Science Computers & Internet Education Engineering History Humanities Law Medicine Professional Science Reference Science Anthropology Children's Studies Communication Customs & Traditions Demography Discrimination & Racism Emigration & Immigration Ethics Folklore & Mythology Gender Studies Gerontology Human Geography Library & Information Science Linguistics Media Studies Methodology Museum Studies & Museology Philanthropy & Charity Philosophy Political Science Popular Culture Pornography Poverty Reference Research Social Work Sociology Special Groups Statistics Violence in Society Summaries and Customer Reviews are supplied by Amazon.com
Customer Reviews:Average Customer Rating: What about the source of all environmental problems? The mind? The kid? As a "skimmer" of No Impact Man, I have issues about the fundamental fundamental muscular/skeletal structure of the entire book itself. I am greatly concerned about the lack of mentioning of the "ultimate source" of environmental problems: too many humans. Having kids. Population. It is the HUMAN MIND that generates the notion of "problems" in the first place, and the fewer humans, the less problems in the world. I am surprised that family planning agencies have not associated their campaigns with environmental problems. For the birth of every child in this world equates to the death of thousands of millions of plants and animals, the excavations of how many tons of rocks and minerals... the sculpting of so many parcels of landscapes... all occurring in a very indirect manner to the life of that child. Thought Stimulus If you are purchasing this book to save the world, don't bother, however, if you are looking for a non strident, thought provoking read then you are on target. Why I gave up on p.114 Bevan is bright, resourceful, even likable, and I love his accounts of matrimonial decision making. However, neither the style nor the substance of this book makes for a very compelling read. What finally made me give up on p.114, however, is the prominence of Bevan's Yuppie values. "It's not , sadly for me, that I never want to be rich or have a big house.....But the question still plagues me: What will it all count for when I'm gone." I did like the idea that city living can be more sustainable than a more spread out population pattern. Constructive guilt A punch on the face of those like me, and the author, who complain too much about "how few is done" to protect the enviroment, but don't usually ask themselves "how much can I do". A field guide, if you have courage, or at least something to meditate about. I wanted to like it, but... I got this book after reading "Sleeping Naked is Green..." - the author of that book mentioned No Impact Man. I really wanted to like No Impact Man - but I didn't. I still like the premise, but his writing was all over the place. I actually didn't get all the way to the end which isn't normal for me. | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ![]() | |
| |