| | ||
| | | |
| |||
| |
|
| |
![]() | ![]() |
|
| | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() Accounting & Finance Architecture Arts & Photography Business & Investing Business Management Computer Science Computers & Internet Education Engineering History Humanities Law Medicine Professional Science Reference Science Anthropology Children's Studies Communication Customs & Traditions Demography Discrimination & Racism Emigration & Immigration Ethics Folklore & Mythology Gender Studies Gerontology Human Geography Library & Information Science Linguistics Media Studies Methodology Museum Studies & Museology Philanthropy & Charity Philosophy Political Science Popular Culture Pornography Poverty Reference Research Social Work Sociology Special Groups Statistics Violence in Society Summaries and Customer Reviews are supplied by Amazon.com
Customer Reviews:Average Customer Rating: Isn't critical but seems supportive of dysfunction. Reading this book sort of reminds me of Jim Carrey's routine on Living Color, "the dysfunctional home show." Are you ready for some dysfunction? The author captures well the rhetoric of these simians trying to wax profound. I don't think he traces the origin of this, shall we say, dysfunction. For example, when you look at the Circle Jerks or the Dead Kennedys, we find a theme at war with another theme, such as that of Sid Vicious. The former were juwes who tried to remold the punk rock scene into a platform for their ideas. Meanwhile, the nazi theme wanted to rebel against the rebellion by staying off drugs and so on. The end product was a frankenstein monster of clueless kids who look like Linus van Pelt with an attitude. The author delved deep, but not deep enough. Why not tell the truth? Moreover, why not call this group of individuals for what it is, namely a collective body of sociopaths! To imply a depth that isn't there is not fair to the reader. I mean, I've seen some of the dumbest kids who subscribe to this stuff. Calling it a subculture implies it is a culture. Culture, by definition, should not be associated with unruly morons who are against the status quo and who pride themselves on not having a motive for being against the status quo. It's like trying to find a zen experience in the antics pee wee Herman. The author, like the straight edgers themselves, attempts to envision the depth of a Socrates in the madcap protégé whose head has been hit too many times in the mosh pit. That's not fair to the kids, nor too the reader. These kids need to know that their lives have been manipulated by leftist juwes who want to harness their energies in support of a socialistic agenda. A good start This book is a first that I know of on the subject that's written by both an academic and a current member/participant. Just because of that fact it is worth checking out. I think it does a good job explaining the movement in a way that makes sense to both members and interested outsiders, without sensationalizing it as usually done by non-participants, or demonizing or downplaying it as sometimes done by ex-participants. An actual sociological study, this book is a lot more than interviews with bands, stories and anecdotes. Pass on this one I can't tell you how disappointed I was in this book. Being straightedge for 11 years, I was initially excited that someone had finally written an academic book on the subject. This book however, not only falls terribly short of anything that could remotely be called academic (not well written at all), it also fails to really look at straightedge in an in depth way. From discussing fashion trends to dancing/moshing styles, the book strays into irrelevancy over and over again. I would have loved to read some intelligent quotes from "scenesters" as well instead of the usual "how can I trust a sellout" and "true till death" stuff you can hear at any hardcore show. Ive got no title The title gets the idea wrong from the begining. Clean living. I saw the guys from Earth Crisis chase a punk down the street in Birmingham, AL because he was wearing a leather jacket.Clean living? Bourgeois politics. Mainline and straight-edge are or should be considered two different takes on an idea. The idea that you shouldnt put all you life's importance on drinking,sex, and smoking. That allowing brands to create your lifestyle culture isn't rebellion. Its supporting the system of corporate abuse some of us see. You can have a drink, you can have sex, and still be straight edge. Being a drunk and a screwing everyone and everything you see isnt being straight-edge. This is exactly why a second version of Out Of Step had to be recorded. No Thanks (not just a UC song anymore!) I was stoked on this book when I first heard about it, but having read it over the summer I can safely say that I'd not recommend it to anyone. It fails both in its depiction of the straight edge scene and as an academic text. | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ![]() | |
| |