| | ||
| | | |
| |||
| |
|
| |
![]() | ![]() |
|
| | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() Accounting & Finance Architecture Arts & Photography Business & Investing Business Management Computer Science Computers & Internet Education Engineering History Humanities Law Medicine Professional Science Reference Agricultural Sciences Social Sciences Archaeology Astronomy Behavioral Sciences Biological Sciences Chemistry Earth Sciences Education Essays & Commentary Evolution Experiments, Instruments & Measurement History & Philosophy Mathematics Medicine Nature & Ecology Physics Reference Technology Summaries and Customer Reviews are supplied by Amazon.com
Customer Reviews:Average Customer Rating: Tedious and pretentious. I suspect that this book was designed for those who need to be seen in public reading a book with an intellectual looking title in big, bold letters. I promise you, more thought went into the cover of this book than went into it's 37,000 pages of drivel. You Can Disagree But You Can't Ignore Him Fantastic work. Provides us with insight into the best that science now knows about thought. Rather than leading to materialist determinism, this work honestly describes the roles of nature, nurture and "we don't know". The most interesting book I've read in a few years 21st century version of Kant's "a priory" categories Each of the chapters of the book is interesting in its own right, but the book does not really form a coherent whole. It seems as if the author had chosen randomly several linguistic and other topics that interested him and in a final chapter had tried to unite all the information contained in the various chapters to form a conclusion as to how all the topics reveal the way the human mind works. the stuff of thought steven pinker heavy going but if you are interested in the development of language and wish to have an alternative to the chomsky theory then this book is interesting and absorbing. Theoretical discussion of language Steven Pinker's enthusiasm about language comes through everywhere in this book - which is a good thing, because the subject matter itself is dense and complex. This combination results in a curious reading experience: Pinker's lively style, many anecdotes and extreme lucidity pull you forward in the text, but the difficulty of the questions he raises could stump you for some time. He explores many linguistic theories in such depth that readers without a particular interest in the field may, frankly, get lost or find the book too abstract, despite Pinker's numerous attempts to ground his discussions in reality. Therefore, while this is a fine book, getAbstract recommends it primarily to patient readers who have a strong interest in language and philosophy. Bring along an open mind and a sense of humor, since Pinker explores language practices - such as obscenities and insults - that may provoke emotional responses. | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ![]() | |
| |