| | ||
| | | |
| |||
| |
|
| |
![]() | ![]() |
|
| | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() Accounting & Finance Architecture Arts & Photography Business & Investing Business Management Computer Science Computers & Internet Education Engineering History Humanities Law Medicine Professional Science Reference Agricultural Sciences Social Sciences Archaeology Astronomy Behavioral Sciences Biological Sciences Chemistry Earth Sciences Education Essays & Commentary Evolution Experiments, Instruments & Measurement History & Philosophy Mathematics Medicine Nature & Ecology Physics Reference Technology Summaries and Customer Reviews are supplied by Amazon.com
Customer Reviews:Average Customer Rating: Diagnostic Microbiology, Bailey & Scott's This is an excellent resource book for Medical Technologists working in the clinical microbiology laboratory. Diagnostic Microbiology the Item came in a speedy manner and was in like new condition. I would order from this site again. Overall a good book This book holds a lot of useful information from safety to bacteria. Some of the parasitology was lacking and all of the tables can be useful or a menace depending on how well you can learn from them. The pictures were very useful and everything is easy to understand. Nice Book The great pictures and tables in this book keep it interesting, the only bad thing about it is that there are no end-of-chapter reviews or questions. Is it really good? The eleventh edition is good in many aspects. But it cannot be denied that it is not as good as Koneman's book. Bailey and Scott is more suitable only for the bench technicians and not for researchers and graduate students. The book churns out table after table, in the name of comparative analysis. A student's mind will have difficulty in memorising and reproducing tables in the exam. In that sense, the lucid style of presentation in Koneman is commendable. Probably, the author of B&S did not have 'the student' in their mind when they wrote it. Another grossly lacking area is Parasitology. When compared to books written by Indian authors like SC Parija and Chatterjea, Bailey and Scott lags far behind. Probably, it is because parasitic infections are less in the US, which is why this area has been under emphasised. | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ![]() | |
| |