| | ||
| | | |
| |||
| |
|
| |
![]() | ![]() |
|
| | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() Accounting & Finance Architecture Arts & Photography Business & Investing Business Management Computer Science Computers & Internet Education Engineering History Humanities Law Medicine Professional Science Reference Agricultural Sciences Social Sciences Archaeology Astronomy Behavioral Sciences Biological Sciences Chemistry Earth Sciences Education Essays & Commentary Evolution Experiments, Instruments & Measurement History & Philosophy Mathematics Medicine Nature & Ecology Physics Reference Technology Summaries and Customer Reviews are supplied by Amazon.com
Customer Reviews:Average Customer Rating: wonderfully suggestive but not well grounded For better or worse, Agamben is now part of the oxygen literary critics need to breathe. That said, this book is marvelously suggestive, and at its best, really helps one to think about how method dictates the content of argument. The weakness is that many of the claims are really grounded in the signature of Agamben, and one would really like historically specific examples for the broad charges levied against, for example, scientific methods of the early modern and modern periods. | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ![]() | |
| |