| | ||
| | | |
| |||
| |
|
| |
![]() | ![]() |
|
| | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() Accounting & Finance Architecture Arts & Photography Business & Investing Business Management Computer Science Computers & Internet Education Engineering History Humanities Law Medicine Professional Science Almanacs & Yearbooks Science Atlases & Maps Business Skills Careers Catalogs & Directories Consumer Guides Dictionaries & Thesauruses Education Encyclopedias Etiquette Foreign Languages Fun Facts Genealogy Job Hunting Large Print Law Publishing & Books Quotations Spanish-Language Reference Study Guides Test Prep Central Words & Language Writing Social Sciences Summaries and Customer Reviews are supplied by Amazon.com
Customer Reviews:Average Customer Rating: Need to up your B.S. skills? Read on. Listen, and listen good. This book helped me more than any other source of information digested prior to law school. I read it in the summer prior to 1L and thought it was a waste of time. Then, by chance, I sat on the john the night before my Property I exam and hit the highlights again and thank God I did. Our property final was your typical convoluted, semi-retarted, multi-paragraphed question in which the student is asked to consider all relevant facts and rule accordingly. Too bad nothing we covered the entire semester was even vaguely present within the hypo. Let me tell you the honest truth - fellow students left that exam after 3 hours having written less than a page of material because nobody - me included - knew what in the hell the prof was looking for. beyond exams This book is about thinking like a lawyer. No other book breaks down the "taxonomy" of legal problems like this book. It should be required reading for all entering 1Ls. Great book As a struggling 1L who didn't do so well her first semester, I would highly recommend this book. Professors/study groups do not teach you HOW to ace exams, they merely teach you the law. worth your time This book is a classic for a reason: it provides practical advice that can actually help you improve your scores on law school exams. I don't know of a better book out there on this topic (though there are many similar books on the market). I suggest reading this before you even start your first term in law school because the concepts discussed in the book--such as issue spotting--are useful (even necessary) to know before going to class you 1L year. I'd recommend this book to anybody attending (or about to be attending) law school. Not particularly useful This book breaks down issues you'll find on exams categorically. Then you can study each category and learn to spot similar issues on exams (the idea is that you can develop strategies to handle each issue). This is all great. The unfortunate thing is that these categories overlap and are... somewhat arbitrary. I follow the "forks in the facts" vs "forks in the law" distinction, factual issues vs legal issues. But then the categorization gets taken to excess with divisions and subdivisions of categories. "Twin forks". Etc. I suppose my biggest concern is that anyone who did well enough on the LSAT likely can see the legal issues themselves. People think differently. Restricting yourself to this formalization that the authors constructed might actually detract you from seeing the obvious. It will certainly take up valuable study time to memorize these categories and how to spot them, with very limited utility. On the up side, there are sample problems at the end of the book, and some sample questions throughout. Although some of them seem to require specific legal knowledge, which isn't particularly useful to you if you're a first year student just starting out. | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ![]() | |
| |