| | ||
| | | |
| |||
| |
|
| |
![]() | ![]() |
|
| | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() Accounting & Finance Architecture Arts & Photography Business & Investing Business Management Computer Science Computers & Internet Education Engineering Africa Humanities Americas Ancient Arctic & Antarctica Asia Australia & Oceania Europe Gay & Lesbian Historical Study Large Print Middle East Military Military Science Russia United States World Law Medicine Professional Science Reference Science Social Sciences Summaries and Customer Reviews are supplied by Amazon.com
Customer Reviews:Average Customer Rating: Great American story, but ironically in need of an editor Highly enjoyable read--good narrative. Generally incisive, though the incisiveness is sometimes marred by what seems to be the author's class-consciousness (envy even, at least an uncomfortable vacillation between adoring and reviling the Chandlers)--and petty descriptions of physical characteristics of those he's writing about. (Kyle Palmer is constantly referred to as a "gnome" or an "odd-looking dwarf"; Buff Chandler has a "carnivorous overbite" etc.) Also, there are mixed metaphors and immature circumlocutions, though these are probably less the author's fault than the publisher's. Like most others published today, what this book needs is good editors, copy-, research- and otherwise, though these editing problems are overcome by the compelling Chandler story, and McDougal's evident drive to tell it. Privileged Son: Otis Chandler and the Rise and Fall of the L.A. Times Dynasty Excellent history not only of The Times but of early Los Angeles and the not-so-angelic characters involved in the development of the City of Angels. Really makes me long for the glory days -- the Otis Chandler years -- of the newspaper. They say there's a time and a place for everything. Online journalism has its place, but I sure miss The Times. Adonis with issues The first few pages are written in a glitzy, sophomoric style that is grating. Fortunately the book straightens out into a well-researched and well-written history of LA, the LAT and the Chandler/Otis families. Otis Chandler is the most interesting person in the book, a driven, hollow man. The book misses some opportunities to delve deeper into Otis. For example, in the sections on deer hunting it comes as close as anywhere to approaching the mind of Otis, the way it was tormented by killing, and yet driven to kill. Couldn't the author have worked with this more throughout the biography? An exceptional look at Los Angeles history... When I originally sat down to read Privileged Son, I expected what the subtitle promised - a biography and a business book. What I found was that and much more. Of particular value was the history of Los Angeles as seen through the experiences of Otis Chandler's great-grandfather. That Rarest of Things-- a really readable business biography _Priveleged Son_ manages to hit that sweet spot that so many biographies of business figures fail to capture-- it manages to be a very good look at a business and industry and at the same time be readable and enjoyable on the level of a novel. While ostensibly a biography of Otis Chandler, it gives a fascinating look at the rise of a newspaper as local empire and the same newspaper's (largely unsuccessful) efforts to translate that into a truly national business. Without any industry focus, the story of the Chandlers and their relationship to LA is the stuff of novels (pulp fiction and true romance)-- LA grows up with its paper in this book. I was particularly fascinated to read what happened at the paper under the direction of Mark "Cereal Killer" Willes. His ill-starred management is a cautionary tale for would-be media moguls who fail to understand the core values that make up the news industry. A great read for people interested in the media industry. A just-as-great read for people who like a good story. | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ![]() | |
| |