| | ||
| | | |
| |||
| |
|
| |
![]() | ![]() |
|
| | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() Accounting & Finance Architecture Arts & Photography Business & Investing Human Resources & Personnel Management Computer Science Management & Leadership Marketing & Sales Organizational Behavior Computers & Internet Education Engineering History Humanities Law Medicine Professional Science Reference Science Social Sciences Summaries and Customer Reviews are supplied by Amazon.com
Customer Reviews:Average Customer Rating: Opinions Rather than Facts I was disappointed that the book is simply the author's view of the world, with no facts or back-up research. As has been illustrated by other popular authors (Malcolm Gladwell's books as well as Levitt and Dubner's Freakonomics), just because something seems intuitive, doesn't mean it works. Ries & Ries use examples to support their theories, but unfortunately what was popular at the time of the book's publishing (2002), didn't continue for some of the companies. For example, they state "expanding your brand will diminish your power" and use GM as an example (which is a good one). But what about Apple's expansion from computers into the iPod and iPhone? They use Starbucks and Toys R Us as examples of brands that are well served by "keeping a narrow focus" and yet Starbucks has stumbled badly and Toys R Us had to sell itself to a group of investors in 2005 due to competition from Wal-Mart (which doesn't "keep a narrow focus"). This book could be good to stimulate ideas but don't look for any of the author's theories to be backed up with evidence proving they actually help to make the business better. Best book on branding I've read yet. As a marketing professional with an advertising degree and fifteen years of experience, the more marketing I do, the more these "Immutable Laws of Branding" seem come into play. When I first read this book six or seven years ago, I thought, "Well, I understand and agree with most of the precepts, but not all of them." But, as I've managed marketing campaigns and projects over the years, whenever one wouldn't get the results I wanted (or expected), after going back and reviewing it, the issue oftentimes could be clearly tied back to the violation of at least a couple of the "laws." Best branding book out there Best branding book out there. Mr. Ries and his daughter has been presenting practical examples of real case companies who have applied good and bad practices, and the results and conclusions are widely seen in real life. This book must be an essential reading for anybody who wants to develop new products. Authors think Amazon is Amazon b/c of "branding" I only made it through about 30 pages before I decided it wasn't worth my time. I earnestly started and read probably 10-12 pages and, after several WTF moments, I skipped to the next chapter. After more WTF moments I started flipping around and eventually just decided to quit reading it. Should be required reading for Execs and MBA students This book is an incredibly easy read - you can read it in one day. That doesn't diminish the value at all - this should be required reading for every executive - because most execs are branding idiots. The 22 laws are all backed up with solid examples using well-known brands, so there is a great amount of credibility and it generates a lot of food for thought. This isn't the first branding book I've read, and while I didn't agree with everything, I agree with 90% of it. And, if I could get the execs at my own company to follow 90% of the rules, we'd be a much better company. | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ![]() | |
| |